Skip to content

Eloralintide Side Effects Reported in Clinical Trials

Last verified How this was verified

Clinical development

What the published trials reported about adverse events with eloralintide, set out with the study each figure comes from. This is a record of trial findings, not medical advice.

Phase I, single dose

In the first-in-human study of 48 healthy participants, no serious adverse events occurred. Seventeen treatment-emergent events were reported across 10 participants. Only two of the 36 participants given eloralintide had a gastrointestinal event, both at the 12 mg dose, including one case of moderate vomiting.

[Verified V-04] Confirmed against the full text of Briere et al. 2025 (2026-09-18).

Phase I, 12 weeks of weekly doses

In the 100-participant multiple-ascending-dose study, 59 participants reported at least one treatment-emergent event. Those occurring in 10% or more of participants were decreased appetite (19.2%), headache (12.3%), COVID-19 (11.0%) and fatigue (11.0%). Gastrointestinal events were concentrated in the groups given larger amounts, for example nausea in 13% at 6 mg and 8.3% at 12 mg, and diarrhoea in 11.1% at 12 mg. Two serious events occurred, one in the placebo group and one in the 6 mg group, both judged unrelated to eloralintide, and there were no deaths. Thirteen participants stopped because of an adverse event, 11 on eloralintide and 2 on placebo.

[Verified V-05] Confirmed against the full text of Bhattachar et al. 2026 (2026-09-18).

Phase II, 48 weeks

In the 263-participant trial, nausea was reported by 14% on placebo against 11% (1 mg), 13% (3 mg), 64% (6 mg), 33% (9 mg), 54% (6 to 9 mg escalation) and 25% (3 to 6 to 9 mg escalation). Fatigue was 12% on placebo against 0%, 13%, 29%, 43%, 46% and 21% in the same groups. The groups were small, which is part of why the 6 mg figure is higher than the 9 mg figure. Lilly described the most common events as mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue, more frequent at higher doses and less frequent with slower escalation.

[Verified V-10] Rates by arm confirmed against the PubMed abstract of Billings et al. (PMID 41207310) on 2026-09-20. Discontinuation and serious-event counts by arm are not in the free abstract and are not reported here.

Phase II, with tirzepatide

In the 367-participant EloraTZP study in adults with type 2 diabetes, Lilly reported that stopping treatment because of adverse events ranged from 10.8% to 27.0% across the combination arms and 0% to 10.8% across the eloralintide-alone arms, against 2.9% with tirzepatide alone and 16.7% with placebo. The placebo figure is higher than the tirzepatide figure, so these rates are not a clean ranking. Lilly said events were mostly gastrointestinal, generally mild or moderate and mainly during dose escalation, and more frequent in the combination arms.

[Verified V-35] Sponsor announcement of 2026-09-30, read directly on 2026-10-01. Not peer reviewed; no confidence intervals given.

Other findings reviewers have noted

A 2026 literature review notes that early studies suggest eloralintide lowers pulse rate, in contrast to the rise in heart rate seen with GLP-1 receptor agonists, but stresses that the evidence is small and short and that no amylin receptor agonist has had a dedicated cardiovascular outcomes trial. A 2026 network meta-analysis found that gastrointestinal events were more common with high-dose amylin-based therapies, based on sparse, low-certainty data.

[Verified V-50] Cardiology in Review review, abstract read 2026-10-01 and again 2026-10-02. Network meta-analysis (Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, PMID 42175595) abstract read 2026-10-02.

How to read these numbers

  • Adverse event rates from different trials are not comparable, because the protocols collect and count events differently.
  • Placebo groups also report nausea and fatigue, which is why each figure is shown beside its placebo rate.
  • A trial adverse-event table describes a group, not what any one person will experience.
  • Nothing on this page is advice on whether to take or avoid any medicine. Anyone enrolled in a trial should speak to that trial’s own team.

Related

Full efficacy and design detail is on the Phase II page and the Phase I page. For why amylin-based medicines cause nausea, see what is amylin.

References

  1. Briere DA, et al. Eloralintide (LY3841136), a novel amylin receptor agonist for the treatment of obesity: from discovery to clinical proof of concept. Molecular Metabolism. 2025. 102:102271. DOI 10.1016/j.molmet.2025.102271. DOI 10.1016/j.molmet.2025.102271 PMID 41109426 PMC12640043 NCT05295940 P1
  2. Bhattachar SN, et al. Eloralintide, a selective, long-acting amylin receptor agonist for treatment of obesity: Phase 1 proof of concept. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. 2026. 28(4):2651-2660. DOI 10.1111/dom.70439. DOI 10.1111/dom.70439 PMID 41559929 PMC12992164 P1
  3. Billings LK, et al. Eloralintide, a selective amylin receptor agonist for the treatment of obesity: a 48-week Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2025. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)02155-5. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)02155-5 PMID 41207310 NCT06230523 P1
  4. Eli Lilly and Company. Lilly's EloraTZP (combination of eloralintide and tirzepatide) delivered greater weight loss and A1C reduction vs. tirzepatide 15 mg in adults with obesity and type 2 diabetes. Eli Lilly and Company, investor relations. 2026. NCT06603571 P1
  5. Sigalov A, Frishman WH. Cardiometabolic Risk Reduction Through Selective Amylin Receptor Agonism: Emerging Cardiovascular Implications of Eloralintide. Cardiology in Review. 2026. DOI 10.1097/CRD.0000000000001468. DOI 10.1097/CRD.0000000000001468 PMID 42745233 P1
  6. Kamrul-Hasan ABM, et al. Novel Amylin-Based Therapies for Weight Management in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis. Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism. 2026. 9(3):e70247. DOI 10.1002/edm2.70247. DOI 10.1002/edm2.70247 PMID 42175595 P1